Ethical AI Implementation
Your team is already using ChatGPT. Vendors are pitching AI features. You need governance before tools proliferate, not after problems emerge.
The Challenge
AI tools are being deployed without oversight:
- Staff use ChatGPT with client data
- Vendors promise AI features without transparency
- No framework for evaluating risks
- Hallucinations and errors go unverified
- Data leakage concerns are unaddressed
- Dependency on tools that may change or disappear
You need help evaluating, implementing, and governing AI responsibly.
What We Deliver
| Deliverable | Description |
|---|---|
| AI Tool Evaluation | Vendor-neutral assessment (privacy, accuracy, bias, cost) |
| Use Policy Development | Clear acceptable use guidelines for your organization |
| Risk Assessment | Data leakage, hallucinations, dependency, bias risks |
| Staff Training | Responsible AI use, limitations, verification practices |
| Governance Framework | Decision processes for evaluating and approving new AI tools |
Engagement Options
| Package | Investment (NOK) | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| AI Readiness Assessment | 12,000 | Current state analysis, recommendations |
| Policy Development | 18,000-25,000 | Acceptable use policy + staff training |
| Tool Evaluation | 8,000-12,000 per tool | Deep-dive on specific AI product |
| Governance Framework | 35,000-45,000 | Full governance structure, criteria |
Why FTRCRP?
- Vendor neutral. We don’t sell AI tools; no conflicts of interest
- Deep understanding. We know how AI actually works, beyond the marketing claims
- Ethics built in. Framework approach, not bolt-on compliance
- Current knowledge. Active with EU AI Act phases, Norwegian implementation
The Outcome
After working with us, your organization will have:
- Clear policy on acceptable AI use in the workplace
- Evaluation criteria for new AI tools
- Staff trained on responsible use and limitations
- Governance process for AI-related decisions
- Documented risk assessments for deployed tools
Questions We Help You Answer
- What data can employees put into AI tools?
- Which AI vendors can we trust with sensitive information?
- How do we verify AI outputs before relying on them?
- What approval process should govern new AI adoption?
- How do we balance productivity gains against risks?
How We Evaluate AI Tools
We assess:
| Dimension | What We Look For |
|---|---|
| Privacy | Where does data go? How is it stored/processed? |
| Accuracy | What are the failure modes? How often does it hallucinate? |
| Bias | What training data biases might affect outputs? |
| Dependency | What happens if the service changes or disappears? |
| Cost | Total cost of ownership including hidden costs |
| Fit | Does this actually solve your problem better than alternatives? |
Are We Anti-AI?
No. We use AI tools daily in our own work. We’re pro-thoughtful-AI-implementation.
The goal is to capture benefits while managing risks. Organizations rushing to deploy AI without governance create real problems; organizations that thoughtfully integrate AI tools gain competitive advantage.
Is Your Team Already Using ChatGPT?
Possibly a problem. Questions to consider:
- What data are they putting into the tool?
- What are the vendor’s terms about data usage?
- Are outputs being verified before use?
- Is there any governance over which tools are approved?
We help organizations answer these questions and establish frameworks for responsible AI use.
Ready to Get Started?
Free 30-minute consultation to discuss your AI challenges.
Email: HAL0zum@proton.me
FTRCRP | Ethics-first technology consulting